The conquerors of Chili and Peru, and of almost all the other Spanish settlements upon the continent of America, carried out with them no other public encouragement, but a general permission to make settlements and conquests in the name of the king of Spain.

Democracy is rooted in compromise, not conquest.

These books show that history is more than battles and conquests.

the right to redress for past conquests (articles 28 and 37 of

On the contrary, the aggressor forces have their sights set on further conquests of territory.

The past century was replete with examples of nations preening themselves for conquest and domination.

Since the conquest and colonization of America, the Dominican Republic has defended human rights.

Nonetheless, invasions and conquest were not conducive to an evolving process of protection and promotion of human rights.

That is all part of the history of the world: the history of European conquest, with its glory and tragedy.

The concept of native title referred to rights to lands and domains held before the Spanish conquest.

The widespread settlement of Transcaucasia by Armenians began after tsarist Russia's military conquest of the Caucasus.

But the feudal law is not supposed to have become the common law of England till after the Conquest.

Before the conquest of the Spaniards there were no cattle fit for draught either in Mexico or Peru.

The Saxon princes, and the first kings after the Conquest, seem likewise to have accumulated treasures.

Even then it was, probably, in a better condition than it had been at the Norman Conquest, and at the Norman Conquest than during the confusion of the Saxon Heptarchy.

The authority and jurisdiction of the Saxon lords in England appear to have been as great before the Conquest as that of any of the Norman lords after it.

The frequent conquests of all the civilised countries in Asia by the Tartars sufficiently demonstrates the natural superiority which the militia of a barbarous has over that of a civilised nation.

The English and Dutch companies, though they have established no considerable colonies, except the two above mentioned, have both made considerable conquests in the East Indies.

That of beaver skins, of beaver wool, and of gum Senega has been subjected to higher duties. Great Britain, by the conquest of Canada and Senegal, having got almost the monopoly of those commodities.

These last, however, must have been purchased either immediately with the produce of domestic industry, or with something else that had been purchased with it; for, the case of war and conquest excepted, foreign goods can ever be acquired but in exchange for something that had been produced at home, either immediately, or after two or more different exchanges.

(3) The former demand that the proletariat be trained for revolution by utilizing the present state. The anarchists reject this. In this controversy, it is not Kautsky but Pannekoek who represents Marxism, for it was Marx who taught that the proletariat cannot simply win state power in the sense that the old state apparatus passes into new hands, but must smash this apparatus, must break it and replace it by a new one. Kautsky abandons Marxism for the opportunist camp, for this destruction of the state machine, which is utterly unacceptable to the opportunists, completely disappears from his argument, and he leaves a loophole for them in that "conquest" may be interpreted as the simple acquisition of a majority. To cover up his distortion of Marxism, Kautsky behaves like a doctrinaire: he puts forward a "quotation" from Marx himself.